PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSWWX vs. NEFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund (LSWWX) and Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSWWX achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than NEFSX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LSWWX has underperformed NEFSX with an annualized return of 9.67%, while NEFSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.08% annualized return.


LSWWX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.81%
6M
7.41%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
9.67%

NEFSX

1D
-1.13%
1M
2.39%
YTD
0.81%
6M
2.20%
1Y
14.35%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
15.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSWWX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund
6.81%12.83%12.61%22.39%-23.13%14.46%15.35%26.81%-5.10%22.12%
NEFSX
Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund
0.81%17.23%25.79%37.13%-21.15%23.21%22.12%31.08%-6.67%26.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LSWWX and NEFSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1996

0.82

The correlation between LSWWX and NEFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSWWX vs. NEFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSWWX
LSWWX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LSWWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSWWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSWWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LSWWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSWWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

NEFSX
NEFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NEFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NEFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund (LSWWX) and Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSWWXNEFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.63

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.51

5.12

+6.39

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSWWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is higher than the NEFSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSWWX and NEFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSWWXNEFSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

1.40

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.58

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.78

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.60

+0.13

Drawdowns

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSWWX drawdown since its inception was -48.31%, smaller than the maximum NEFSX drawdown of -55.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSWWX and NEFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSWWXNEFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-55.83%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-11.20%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-19.58%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.80%

-30.08%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.80%

-32.27%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.13%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-11.75%

+4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.86%

-1.76%

Volatility

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund (LSWWX) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (NEFSX) at 2.86%. This indicates that LSWWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSWWXNEFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

2.86%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

10.28%

-1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

12.99%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

19.59%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.92%

19.71%

-5.79%

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSWWX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than NEFSX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSWWX vs. NEFSX - Dividend Comparison

LSWWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, less than NEFSX's 9.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSWWX
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund
7.31%7.81%7.53%4.01%10.19%7.66%6.21%2.93%4.80%2.37%1.53%5.76%
NEFSX
Natixis Funds Trust I U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund
9.23%5.92%6.38%8.13%18.10%11.12%13.07%10.85%11.18%3.55%1.88%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSWWX and NEFSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSWWX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to NEFSX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSWWX dropped -48.31% vs NEFSX's -55.83%.

LSWWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSWWX and NEFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer