PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSVVX vs. THPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVVX achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly higher than THPGX's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVVX has underperformed THPGX with an annualized return of 10.89%, while THPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.86% annualized return.


LSVVX

1D
0.43%
1M
4.89%
YTD
15.43%
6M
17.82%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
10.89%

THPGX

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.14%
YTD
11.68%
6M
15.26%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
14.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
15.43%19.63%3.97%12.19%-4.02%28.57%-3.46%25.29%-11.10%16.18%
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
11.68%27.10%17.14%22.06%-15.78%28.09%15.49%33.59%-12.31%18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVVX and THPGX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007

0.93

The correlation between LSVVX and THPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSVVX vs. THPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVVX
LSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

THPGX
THPGX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
THPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
THPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
THPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
THPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSVVXTHPGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

3.31

-0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.64

4.60

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.59

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

4.98

+0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.96

20.33

+1.63

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the THPGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVVX and THPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSVVXTHPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

3.31

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.69

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.50

-0.17

Drawdowns

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVVX drawdown since its inception was -61.62%, smaller than the maximum THPGX drawdown of -65.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVVX and THPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSVVXTHPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.62%

-65.52%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-8.16%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-18.75%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-26.49%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.61%

-40.68%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-9.58%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

2.00%

-0.36%

Volatility

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Volatility Comparison

LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) at 2.64%. This indicates that LSVVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSVVXTHPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.64%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

8.88%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

12.44%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

17.76%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

19.94%

-1.44%

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVVX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than THPGX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSVVX vs. THPGX - Dividend Comparison

LSVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.86%, more than THPGX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
11.86%13.69%2.45%6.57%5.41%3.67%2.40%21.48%3.91%1.98%2.37%2.38%
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
5.02%5.60%11.97%8.38%5.06%4.95%0.90%2.73%0.89%0.82%0.80%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSVVX and THPGX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSVVX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to THPGX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVVX dropped -61.62% vs THPGX's -65.52%.

THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.31 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSVVX and THPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer