PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSVVX vs. FSWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LSVVX having a 15.43% return and FSWCX slightly higher at 16.06%.


LSVVX

1D
0.43%
1M
4.89%
YTD
15.43%
6M
17.82%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
10.89%

FSWCX

1D
1.04%
1M
6.84%
YTD
16.06%
6M
19.79%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
15.43%19.63%3.97%12.19%-4.02%28.57%-3.46%25.29%-11.10%-0.11%
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
16.06%22.50%19.90%12.64%-3.50%30.43%-4.44%29.09%-11.54%0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVVX and FSWCX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017

0.97

The correlation between LSVVX and FSWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSVVX vs. FSWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVVX
LSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FSWCX
FSWCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FSWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSVVXFSWCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.26

3.65

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.64

5.00

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.67

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.79

7.13

-1.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.96

25.14

-3.18

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the FSWCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVVX and FSWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSVVXFSWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26

3.65

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.87

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.59

-0.26

Drawdowns

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVVX drawdown since its inception was -61.62%, which is greater than FSWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVVX and FSWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSVVXFSWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.62%

-41.41%

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-5.77%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-16.13%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-19.62%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.20%

-5.58%

-6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.63%

+0.01%

Volatility

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Volatility Comparison

LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund (FSWCX) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSVVXFSWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.79%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

7.66%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

11.21%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.70%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.50%

20.79%

-2.29%

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVVX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FSWCX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSVVX vs. FSWCX - Dividend Comparison

LSVVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.86%, more than FSWCX's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSWCX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Value Index Fund
6.37%7.40%8.86%9.68%12.90%5.71%2.55%2.37%3.84%0.07%0.00%0.00%
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
11.86%13.69%2.45%6.57%5.41%3.67%2.40%21.48%3.91%1.98%2.37%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LSVVX and FSWCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LSVVX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FSWCX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVVX dropped -61.62% vs FSWCX's -41.41%.

FSWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSVVX and FSWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer