LSVD vs. PRXV
LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) and PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSVD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for PRXV.
Performance
LSVD vs. PRXV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LSVD
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 34.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRXV
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSVD vs. PRXV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 8.23% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSVD and PRXV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSVD vs. PRXV — Risk / Return Rank
LSVD
PRXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LSVD vs. PRXV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSVD | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSVD vs. PRXV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, which is greater than PRXV's maximum drawdown of -1.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and PRXV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSVD | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.30% | -1.41% | -17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | 0.00% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -0.37% | -2.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
LSVD vs. PRXV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSVD | PRXV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.20% | 10.12% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 10.12% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 10.12% | +7.23% |
LSVD vs. PRXV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PRXV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSVD vs. PRXV - Dividend Comparison
LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than PRXV's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 0.28% | 0.32% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSVD and PRXV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.
PRXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.28% for LSVD.
They also come from different issuers: LSV and Praxis. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.36% for PRXV.
Find the right allocation for LSVD and PRXV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer