LSVD vs. DIVZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LSVD returned 43.26% vs 10.40% for DIVZ. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSVD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.

Performance

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVD achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.10% return.

LSVD

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 6M: 18.95%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVZ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	17.67%	22.29%	0.14%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	3.10%	16.72%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVD and DIVZ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.46

The correlation between LSVD and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSVD	DIVZ
Technology	34.8%	8.0%
Communication Services	15.4%	5.9%
Financial Services	12.5%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	6.6%
Healthcare	11.8%	16.0%
Industrials	4.8%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	20.0%
Energy	2.0%	19.4%
Basic Materials	1.5%	5.7%
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Utilities	0.8%	17.2%

Return for Risk

LSVD vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 92
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSVD	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.41	1.13	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.64	1.67	+2.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.19	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.38	1.79	+3.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.69	4.44	+20.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVD Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVD and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSVD	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.41	1.13	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.66	0.89	+0.77

Drawdowns

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVD	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-15.42%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-5.83%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-4.50%	+3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-3.49%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	2.35%	-0.59%

Volatility

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVD	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	3.33%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	7.02%	+2.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	9.28%	+3.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	12.65%	+4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.45%	12.57%	+4.88%

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVD vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than DIVZ's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.60%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.27%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVD and DIVZ in my portfolio?

LSVD and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVD or DIVZ?

LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to DIVZ (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVD dropped -19.30% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, LSVD or DIVZ?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 10.40% for DIVZ. On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSVD or DIVZ?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSVD or DIVZ?

LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSVD or DIVZ?

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between LSVD and DIVZ?

They also come from different issuers: LSV and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.65% for DIVZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.