LSVD vs. DFRA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) and DFRA (Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. LSVD is actively managed, while DFRA is passively managed. Over the past year, LSVD returned 37.36% vs 9.80% for DFRA. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSVD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for DFRA.

Performance

LSVD vs. DFRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVD achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly higher than DFRA's 4.86% return.

LSVD

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 13.72%
• 1Y: 37.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFRA

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -3.79%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 9.80%
• 3Y*: 11.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVD vs. DFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	14.66%	22.29%	-2.62%
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	4.86%	6.64%	-2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVD and DFRA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.67

The correlation between LSVD and DFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

LSVD vs. DFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSVD	DFRA
Technology	38.9%	1.5%
Communication Services	14.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.6%	-
Financial Services	11.5%	-
Healthcare	11.2%	-
Industrials	4.4%	35.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	3.2%
Energy	1.7%	26.3%
Basic Materials	1.5%	18.5%
Real Estate	1.2%	12.1%
Utilities	0.8%	2.8%

Return for Risk

LSVD vs. DFRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 90
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 91

DFRA

DFRA Risk / Return Rank: 20
DFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
DFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
DFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 19
DFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
DFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVD vs. DFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSVD	DFRA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	0.65	+2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.83	0.97	+2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.13	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	0.85	+3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.34	2.48	+17.86

LSVD vs. DFRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVD Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the DFRA Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVD and DFRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSVD vs. DFRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, roughly equal to the maximum DFRA drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and DFRA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVD	DFRA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-19.35%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-11.64%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-10.50%	+7.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-4.02%	+1.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.84%	3.97%	-2.13%

Volatility

LSVD vs. DFRA - Volatility Comparison

LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF (DFRA) at 4.19%. This indicates that LSVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVD	DFRA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	4.19%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	13.19%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.23%	15.07%	-1.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	17.50%	+0.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.64%	17.50%	+0.14%

LSVD vs. DFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DFRA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVD vs. DFRA - Dividend Comparison

LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than DFRA's 4.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFRA Donoghue Forlines Yield Enhanced Real Asset ETF	4.35%	2.86%	10.13%	4.70%	8.40%	0.08%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.28%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVD and DFRA in my portfolio?

LSVD and DFRA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVD or DFRA?

LSVD has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DFRA (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVD dropped -19.30% vs DFRA's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, LSVD or DFRA?

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 37.36% vs 9.80% for DFRA. On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSVD or DFRA?

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 37.36% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSVD or DFRA?

LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSVD or DFRA?

DFRA has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.28% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between LSVD and DFRA?

They also come from different issuers: LSV and Donoghue Forlines. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.69% for DFRA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.