LSST vs. ZTWO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO).

LSST and ZTWO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LSST is an actively managed fund by Groupe BPCE. It was launched on Dec 27, 2017. ZTWO is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jan 10, 2024.

Performance

LSST vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSST vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSST Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	0.26%	5.49%	0.36%

Returns By Period

LSST

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZTWO

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSST vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSST has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.

LSST

Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF

ZTWO

F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

LSST vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTWO

ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSST vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSST	ZTWO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	3.23	—

Dividends

LSST vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

LSST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LSST Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	3.44%	3.85%	1.93%	2.73%	3.96%	2.70%	2.59%
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	4.57%	4.31%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	LSST	ZTWO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.93%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.09%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.20%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LSST	ZTWO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.54%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.50%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.50%	—