PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.62% return. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L has underperformed XS2D.L with an annualized return of 15.13%, while XS2D.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.61% annualized return.


LSPU.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.04%
6M
10.06%
YTD
10.36%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
20.21%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
15.13%

XS2D.L

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.38%
6M
17.03%
YTD
17.62%
1Y
39.21%
3Y*
33.50%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
23.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
10.36%17.50%25.55%26.93%-18.54%29.54%17.98%30.74%-5.27%21.92%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
17.62%26.58%45.65%48.87%-39.09%63.03%20.96%62.86%-15.93%43.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPU.L and XS2D.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2010

0.98

The correlation between LSPU.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LSPU.L
XS2D.L

Technology

39.0%
56.8%

Financial Services

11.1%
6.0%

Communication Services

10.6%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.3%
5.7%

Industrials

7.8%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.0%

Energy

3.1%

-

Utilities

2.1%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.2%

Technology

LSPU.L
39.0%
XS2D.L
56.8%

Financial Services

LSPU.L
11.1%
XS2D.L
6.0%

Communication Services

LSPU.L
10.6%
XS2D.L
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPU.L
9.9%
XS2D.L
9.3%

Healthcare

LSPU.L
8.3%
XS2D.L
5.7%

Industrials

LSPU.L
7.8%
XS2D.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

LSPU.L
4.5%
XS2D.L
0.0%

Energy

LSPU.L
3.1%
XS2D.L

-

Utilities

LSPU.L
2.1%
XS2D.L
4.9%

Real Estate

LSPU.L
1.8%
XS2D.L
2.4%

Basic Materials

LSPU.L
1.7%
XS2D.L
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSPU.L
LSPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

XS2D.L
XS2D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XS2D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSPU.LXS2D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.31

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

9.10

+1.77

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the XS2D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPU.L and XS2D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -59.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and XS2D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSPU.LXS2D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.00%

-59.31%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-16.91%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.42%

-34.83%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-46.01%

+21.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.00%

-59.31%

+25.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-1.97%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.87%

-8.93%

+5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

4.30%

-2.28%

Volatility

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) is 2.88%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that LSPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSPU.LXS2D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

5.61%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

18.52%

-9.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.07%

24.27%

-12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

31.89%

-15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

32.34%

-16.09%

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSPU.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while XS2D.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
0.90%0.99%1.29%1.00%2.05%1.11%1.47%1.64%1.96%1.68%1.96%2.01%
XS2D.L
Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LSPU.L and XS2D.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.

LSPU.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and XS2D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer