LSPU.L vs. UC13.L
LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and UC13.L (UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while UC13.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L returned 15.44%/yr vs 13.67%/yr for UC13.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for UC13.L.
Performance
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPU.L is traded in USD, while UC13.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC13.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than UC13.L's 9.66% return. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L has outperformed UC13.L with an annualized return of 15.44%, while UC13.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.67% annualized return.
LSPU.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 27.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
UC13.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 26.62%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.38% | 17.50% | 25.55% | 26.94% | -18.54% | 29.55% | 17.97% | 30.76% | -5.29% | 21.93% |
UC13.L UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 9.66% | 16.57% | 23.67% | 24.37% | -19.63% | 28.29% | 15.23% | 29.41% | -7.09% | 19.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPU.L and UC13.L is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.91 |
The correlation between LSPU.L and UC13.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Financial Services
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Communication Services
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Consumer Cyclical
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Healthcare
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Industrials
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Consumer Defensive
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Energy
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Utilities
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Real Estate
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Basic Materials
LSPU.L
UC13.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPU.L
UC13.L
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSPU.L | UC13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.43 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.81 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 11.87 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSPU.L | UC13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.40 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.79 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 0.85 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.80 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum UC13.L drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and UC13.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPU.L | UC13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -33.60% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -9.42% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.43% | -19.27% | +0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.18% | -26.03% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | -33.60% | -0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.55% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -4.24% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.24% | -0.35% |
Volatility
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis (UC13.L) at 2.59%. This indicates that LSPU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC13.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPU.L | UC13.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 2.59% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 7.91% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 11.05% | +0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 15.72% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 16.23% | +0.05% |
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than UC13.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPU.L vs. UC13.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than UC13.L's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 2.05% | 1.11% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 1.68% | 1.96% | 2.01% |
UC13.L UBS Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD dis | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, LSPU.L and UC13.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UC13.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UC13.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for LSPU.L.
LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UC13.L tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.03% for UC13.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and UC13.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer