LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L
LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and IUIS.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while IUIS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSPU.L returned 13.90%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for IUIS.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIS.L.
Performance
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than IUIS.L's 12.57% return.
LSPU.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 6M
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 27.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
IUIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.90%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- —
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.38% | 17.50% | 25.55% | 26.94% | -18.54% | 29.55% | 17.97% | 30.76% | -5.29% | 16.70% |
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.57% | 19.24% | 17.42% | 17.93% | -5.28% | 20.71% | 9.96% | 28.50% | -14.17% | 16.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPU.L and IUIS.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.80 |
The correlation between LSPU.L and IUIS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
Financial Services
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
-
Communication Services
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
Healthcare
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
-
Industrials
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
Consumer Defensive
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
-
Energy
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
-
Utilities
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
Real Estate
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
-
Basic Materials
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPU.L
IUIS.L
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSPU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.28 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.21 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.72 | 8.53 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSPU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.58 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.70 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.65 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum IUIS.L drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and IUIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.99% | -42.18% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.11% | -10.42% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.43% | -19.59% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.18% | -21.22% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.84% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -5.14% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.70% | -0.81% |
Volatility
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) is 3.13%, while iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUIS.L) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that LSPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPU.L | IUIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.13% | 4.96% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 11.91% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 14.58% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.93% | 17.30% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 19.62% | -3.34% |
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPU.L vs. IUIS.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while IUIS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUIS.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 2.05% | 1.11% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 1.68% | 1.96% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSPU.L and IUIS.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIS.L.
LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IUIS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.15% for IUIS.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and IUIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer