LSPU.L vs. IESU.L
LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and IESU.L (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LSPU.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while IESU.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L returned 14.99%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for IESU.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IESU.L.
Performance
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPU.L is traded in USD, while IESU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IESU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than IESU.L's 28.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L has outperformed IESU.L with an annualized return of 14.99%, while IESU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
LSPU.L
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
IESU.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 9.17% | 17.50% | 25.55% | 26.93% | -18.54% | 29.54% | 17.98% | 30.74% | -5.27% | 21.92% |
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.54% | 9.98% | 3.69% | -1.00% | 63.91% | 52.43% | -33.64% | 9.60% | -18.29% | -1.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPU.L and IESU.L is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015 | 0.41 |
The correlation between LSPU.L and IESU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPU.L
IESU.L
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSPU.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 2.21 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 5.65 | +4.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum IESU.L drawdown of -72.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and IESU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPU.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.00% | -72.57% | +31.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -16.37% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -22.55% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -27.74% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.00% | -66.85% | +32.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -8.87% | +7.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -24.88% | +21.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 6.42% | -4.40% |
Volatility
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) is 3.09%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IESU.L) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that LSPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPU.L | IESU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 6.97% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 21.03% | -11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 23.89% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 29.47% | -13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 29.81% | -13.56% |
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IESU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPU.L vs. IESU.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while IESU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESU.L iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.91% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 2.05% | 1.11% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 1.68% | 1.96% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSPU.L and IESU.L have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IESU.L.
LSPU.L is categorized as S&P 500, while IESU.L is Energy Equities. LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while IESU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.15% for IESU.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and IESU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer