LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L
LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and 5ESG.L (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist) are both S&P 500 funds - LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while 5ESG.L tracks the S&P 500 ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LSPU.L returned 13.22%/yr vs 12.00%/yr for 5ESG.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for 5ESG.L.
Performance
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LSPU.L is traded in USD, while 5ESG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 5ESG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.L's 9.74% return.
LSPU.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
5ESG.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.00%
- 10Y*
- —
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 10.36% | 17.50% | 25.55% | 26.93% | -18.54% | 29.54% | 17.98% | 16.39% |
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 9.74% | 27.18% | 21.56% | 32.83% | -28.76% | 30.39% | 19.38% | 17.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSPU.L and 5ESG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LSPU.L and 5ESG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Financial Services
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Communication Services
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Cyclical
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Healthcare
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Industrials
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Consumer Defensive
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Energy
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Utilities
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Real Estate
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Basic Materials
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSPU.L
5ESG.L
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSPU.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.29 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.87 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.86 | 7.40 | +3.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.L drawdown of -43.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and 5ESG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSPU.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.00% | -43.25% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -13.02% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.42% | -19.80% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -40.13% | +15.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.07% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -8.02% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 3.29% | -1.27% |
Volatility
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) is 2.88%, while UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist (5ESG.L) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that LSPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5ESG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSPU.L | 5ESG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 3.68% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 11.70% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.07% | 14.87% | -2.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.02% | 20.62% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 22.35% | -6.10% |
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 5ESG.L's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSPU.L vs. 5ESG.L - Dividend Comparison
LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than 5ESG.L's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5ESG.L UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF GBP Dist | 0.62% | 0.87% | 0.47% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 0.89% | 1.25% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSPU.L Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD | 0.90% | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 2.05% | 1.11% | 1.47% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 1.68% | 1.96% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSPU.L and 5ESG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while 5ESG.L tracks S&P 500 ESG Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.17% for 5ESG.L.
Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and 5ESG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer