PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LSPU.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LSPU.L (Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds from Amundi - LSPU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while 500U.L tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSPU.L returned 15.44%/yr vs 15.69%/yr for 500U.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSPU.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.

Performance

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LSPU.L having a 10.38% return and 500U.L slightly higher at 10.41%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LSPU.L having a 15.44% annualized return and 500U.L not far ahead at 15.69%.

LSPU.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.18%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.44%

500U.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.52%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.24%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		10.38%17.50%25.55%26.94%-18.54%29.55%17.97%30.76%-5.29%21.93%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc		10.41%17.98%24.83%26.85%-19.06%30.19%18.05%32.02%-5.58%21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPU.L and 500U.L is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2011

0.69

Over the past year, LSPU.L and 500U.L have become more correlated (1.00) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LSPU.L
500U.L

Technology

35.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

LSPU.L
35.6%
500U.L
35.6%

Financial Services

LSPU.L
11.8%
500U.L
11.8%

Communication Services

LSPU.L
11.2%
500U.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPU.L
10.1%
500U.L
10.1%

Healthcare

LSPU.L
8.5%
500U.L
8.5%

Industrials

LSPU.L
8.3%
500U.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

LSPU.L
4.9%
500U.L
4.9%

Energy

LSPU.L
3.5%
500U.L
3.5%

Utilities

LSPU.L
2.4%
500U.L
2.4%

Real Estate

LSPU.L
1.9%
500U.L
1.9%

Basic Materials

LSPU.L
1.8%
500U.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD

Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc

Often compared with LSPU.L:
LSPU.L vs. CSPX.LLSPU.L vs. VUAG.LLSPU.L vs. FXAIXLSPU.L vs. SP5L.LLSPU.L vs. VUAA.DELSPU.L vs. SPYLSPU.L vs. QGRW
Often compared with 500U.L:
500U.L vs. VOO500U.L vs. SPY500U.L vs. ALV.DE500U.L vs. 500P.L500U.L vs. 500D.L500U.L vs. GOOG500U.L vs. VSGX

Return for Risk

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LSPU.L
LSPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

LSPU.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.40
2.41

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.53
3.53

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

3.34

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

14.61

+0.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPU.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LSPU.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.41

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.88

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

1.12

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.23

-0.34

Drawdowns

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, roughly equal to the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and 500U.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LSPU.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-34.04%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-8.34%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-18.29%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-24.22%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

-34.04%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.51%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-4.73%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.91%

-0.02%

Volatility

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) have volatilities of 3.13% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LSPU.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.21%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

8.54%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

11.57%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

15.79%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

18.26%

-1.98%

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LSPU.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while 500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD		0.90%0.99%1.29%1.00%2.05%1.11%1.47%1.64%1.96%1.68%1.96%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 1.00, LSPU.L and 500U.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.

LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer