PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSPU.L vs. 100D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LSPU.L is traded in USD, while 100D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 100D.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSPU.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than 100D.L's 5.78% return.


LSPU.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.45%
YTD
10.38%
6M
11.18%
1Y
27.94%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.44%

100D.L

1D
0.18%
1M
0.84%
YTD
5.78%
6M
9.06%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
10.38%17.50%25.55%26.94%-18.54%29.55%17.97%12.46%
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.78%35.26%7.50%13.03%-6.40%16.93%-9.08%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LSPU.L and 100D.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.63

The correlation between LSPU.L and 100D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LSPU.L
100D.L

Technology

35.6%
0.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
24.5%

Communication Services

11.2%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
13.6%

Industrials

8.3%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
13.9%

Energy

3.5%
11.7%

Utilities

2.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
8.5%

Technology

LSPU.L
35.6%
100D.L
0.8%

Financial Services

LSPU.L
11.8%
100D.L
24.5%

Communication Services

LSPU.L
11.2%
100D.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

LSPU.L
10.1%
100D.L
4.7%

Healthcare

LSPU.L
8.5%
100D.L
13.6%

Industrials

LSPU.L
8.3%
100D.L
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

LSPU.L
4.9%
100D.L
13.9%

Energy

LSPU.L
3.5%
100D.L
11.7%

Utilities

LSPU.L
2.4%
100D.L
5.3%

Real Estate

LSPU.L
1.9%
100D.L
0.9%

Basic Materials

LSPU.L
1.8%
100D.L
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSPU.L
LSPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

100D.L
100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSPU.L100D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.05

+1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.72

6.95

+7.77

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the 100D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSPU.L and 100D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSPU.L100D.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.50

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.64

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.46

+0.42

Drawdowns

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSPU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.99%, smaller than the maximum 100D.L drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSPU.L and 100D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSPU.L100D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.99%

-42.39%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-9.79%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.43%

-13.78%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.18%

-25.99%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-4.41%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-6.17%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.89%

-1.00%

Volatility

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD (LSPU.L) is 3.13%, while Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that LSPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSPU.L100D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

4.95%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.52%

11.24%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

13.36%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.93%

16.62%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

19.31%

-3.03%

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSPU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LSPU.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison

LSPU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than 100D.L's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
3.57%3.78%4.17%3.90%3.80%3.39%3.11%4.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LSPU.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - D-USD
0.90%0.99%1.29%1.00%2.05%1.11%1.47%1.64%1.96%1.68%1.96%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSPU.L and 100D.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LSPU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LSPU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for 100D.L.

LSPU.L is categorized as S&P 500, while 100D.L is Europe Equities. LSPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for LSPU.L and 0.14% for 100D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSPU.L and 100D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer