PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSMSX vs. NPV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LSMSX vs. NPV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LSMSX vs. NPV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
-0.27%3.22%2.22%7.96%-10.03%4.11%4.48%8.16%0.46%4.92%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
4.12%-5.91%24.61%0.42%-31.53%10.93%13.15%29.60%-4.42%2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMSX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than NPV's 4.12% return.


LSMSX

1D
0.21%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*

NPV

1D
1.34%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
4.12%
6M
1.08%
1Y
2.00%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
-1.81%
10Y*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSMSX vs. NPV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NPV's 1.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LSMSX vs. NPV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMSX
LSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NPV
NPV Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NPV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NPV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
NPV Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
NPV Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
NPV Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMSX vs. NPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) and Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSMSXNPVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.22

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

0.36

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.05

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

0.16

+0.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.98

0.37

+1.61

LSMSX vs. NPV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the NPV Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMSX and NPV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSMSXNPVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.22

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

-0.13

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.28

+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between LSMSX and NPV is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LSMSX vs. NPV - Dividend Comparison

LSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than NPV's 7.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSMSX
Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund
3.97%3.83%4.30%3.37%2.38%2.73%2.33%2.55%2.34%0.90%0.00%0.00%
NPV
Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund
7.19%7.55%5.63%3.89%5.08%3.42%3.49%3.58%4.62%4.40%4.87%5.25%

Drawdowns

LSMSX vs. NPV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMSX drawdown since its inception was -15.00%, smaller than the maximum NPV drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMSX and NPV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LSMSXNPVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-44.25%

+29.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

-9.07%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.00%

-44.25%

+29.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-17.90%

+15.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

-10.15%

+7.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.77%

-1.56%

Volatility

LSMSX vs. NPV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) is 1.10%, while Nuveen Virginia Quality Municipal Income Fund (NPV) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that LSMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NPV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LSMSXNPVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

2.43%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

5.20%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

9.05%

-3.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.44%

13.52%

-9.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

13.19%

-8.67%