LSMSX vs. FMBIX
LSMSX (Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund) and FMBIX (Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSMSX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FMBIX.
Performance
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 8.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FMBIX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 2.18% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 2.18% |
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.60% | 1.32% | 5.89% | -10.00% | 1.14% | 3.10% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMSX and FMBIX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.78 |
The correlation between LSMSX and FMBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSMSX vs. FMBIX — Risk / Return Rank
LSMSX
FMBIX
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund (FMBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSMSX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSMSX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMSX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSMSX | FMBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.49% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.51% | — | — |
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FMBIX's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LSMSX vs. FMBIX - Dividend Comparison
LSMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, while FMBIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMBIX Fidelity Municipal Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.60% | 2.29% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 1.59% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.86% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSMSX and FMBIX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LSMSX and FMBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer