LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE
LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and QDVE.DE (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while QDVE.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSMC.DE returned 28.49%/yr vs 26.04%/yr for QDVE.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVE.DE.
Performance
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 63.83% return, which is significantly higher than QDVE.DE's 24.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LSMC.DE has outperformed QDVE.DE with an annualized return of 28.49%, while QDVE.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 26.04% annualized return.
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
QDVE.DE
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- 13.91%
- YTD
- 24.06%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 49.27%
- 3Y*
- 30.81%
- 5Y*
- 25.33%
- 10Y*
- 26.04%
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
QDVE.DE iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 24.06% | 9.99% | 46.12% | 54.14% | -25.83% | 46.77% | 29.69% | 53.86% | 3.04% | 21.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMC.DE and QDVE.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015 | 0.75 |
The correlation between LSMC.DE and QDVE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LSMC.DE
QDVE.DE
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.39 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.37 | 3.14 | +7.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.83 | 8.31 | +24.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 2.40 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.07 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, which is greater than QDVE.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and QDVE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -31.45% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -15.59% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.22% | -29.83% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.77% | -29.83% | -9.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.77% | -31.45% | -8.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -3.08% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -5.80% | -3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 5.91% | -1.95% |
Volatility
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) at 7.12%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSMC.DE | QDVE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 7.12% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 14.85% | +7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.40% | 20.42% | +9.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 22.71% | +8.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 21.73% | +4.33% |
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSMC.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSMC.DE nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSMC.DE and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.
Find the right allocation for LSMC.DE and QDVE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer