LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE
LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LSMC.DE returned 28.49%/yr vs 21.41%/yr for LYMS.DE. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 63.83% return, which is significantly higher than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LSMC.DE has outperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 28.49%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 21.41% annualized return.
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.42%
- 1Y
- 37.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 32.60% | 66.54% | 74.46% | -34.66% | 37.56% | 23.03% | 39.73% | -5.73% | 12.36% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 33.72% | 51.52% | -29.87% | 39.59% | 34.60% | 42.84% | 3.18% | 15.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMC.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2008 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, LSMC.DE and LYMS.DE have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LSMC.DE
LYMS.DE
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSMC.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.42 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.37 | 3.77 | +6.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.83 | 11.23 | +21.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSMC.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 2.40 | +1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | 1.08 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.77 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMC.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -50.00% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -10.02% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.22% | -26.74% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.77% | -31.12% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.77% | -31.12% | -8.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -0.86% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -8.78% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.37% | +0.59% |
Volatility
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) at 4.37%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSMC.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 4.37% | +6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 10.99% | +11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.40% | 15.73% | +14.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 19.91% | +11.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 19.68% | +6.38% |
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSMC.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSMC.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSMC.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for LSMC.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer