LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and LGQI.DE (Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while LGQI.DE is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the SG Global Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LSMC.DE returned 63.68%/yr vs 14.01%/yr for LGQI.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist (LGQI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 70.12% return, which is significantly higher than LGQI.DE's 12.96% return.

LSMC.DE

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 7.04%
• YTD: 70.12%
• 6M: 72.08%
• 1Y: 124.98%
• 3Y*: 63.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LGQI.DE

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 13.57%
• 1Y: 21.37%
• 3Y*: 14.01%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: 7.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	70.12%	32.60%	66.51%	74.52%	-34.67%	-0.88%
LGQI.DE Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist	12.96%	9.73%	15.24%	5.20%	1.74%	2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021	0.16

The correlation between LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 95
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

LGQI.DE

LGQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
LGQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LGQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
LGQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LGQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
LGQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist (LGQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSMC.DE	LGQI.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.85	2.25	+1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.10	3.22	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.40	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.68	4.11	+5.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.90	11.72	+18.19

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the LGQI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than LGQI.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSMC.DE	LGQI.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.64%	-33.28%	-6.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.84%	-5.17%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.22%	-11.51%	-24.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.08%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	0.00%	-4.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.36%	-4.58%	-6.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	1.82%	+2.34%

Volatility

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.90% compared to Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist (LGQI.DE) at 2.84%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSMC.DE	LGQI.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.90%	2.84%	+10.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.77%	7.45%	+16.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.25%	9.57%	+22.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.45%	10.62%	+21.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.45%	12.28%	+20.17%

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

LSMC.DE vs. LGQI.DE - Dividend Comparison

LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LGQI.DE Amundi Global Equity Quality Income UCITS ETF Dist	3.01%	3.40%	4.18%	4.56%	5.04%	3.60%	4.16%	4.52%	4.72%	4.16%	4.06%	4.37%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE in my portfolio?

LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LSMC.DE or LGQI.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSMC.DE or LGQI.DE?

LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

What is the main difference between LSMC.DE and LGQI.DE?

LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while LGQI.DE is Global Equity Income. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while LGQI.DE tracks SG Global Quality Income Index.