LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE
LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while DBXJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LSMC.DE returned 58.88%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for DBXJ.DE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSMC.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DBXJ.DE.
Performance
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 62.48% return, which is significantly higher than DBXJ.DE's 16.18% return.
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 4.14%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 62.48%
- 6M
- 68.29%
- 1Y
- 122.60%
- 3Y*
- 58.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBXJ.DE
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 16.18%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 62.48% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 74.52% | -34.67% | -0.88% |
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 16.18% | 12.58% | 13.75% | 16.43% | -12.41% | -1.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMC.DE and DBXJ.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LSMC.DE
DBXJ.DE
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSMC.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.31 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.37 | 3.05 | +6.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.27 | 9.98 | +19.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown of -51.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and DBXJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMC.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.64% | -51.22% | +11.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.84% | -10.21% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.22% | -16.95% | -19.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -1.09% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -14.61% | +3.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 3.13% | +0.99% |
Volatility
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) at 4.45%. This indicates that LSMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBXJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSMC.DE | DBXJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 4.45% | +7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.59% | 15.27% | +8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.34% | 19.03% | +12.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 16.64% | +15.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 16.38% | +15.95% |
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSMC.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DBXJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSMC.DE vs. DBXJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSMC.DE nor DBXJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSMC.DE and DBXJ.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.
LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while DBXJ.DE is Japan Equities. LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LSMC.DE and 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for LSMC.DE and DBXJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer