LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE
LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) and ARAW.DE (abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index, while ARAW.DE is a Materials fund actively managed by abrdn. LSMC.DE is passively managed, while ARAW.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, LSMC.DE returned 130.64% vs 137.40% for ARAW.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSMC.DE achieves a 63.83% return, which is significantly higher than ARAW.DE's 26.31% return.
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- -3.34%
- 1M
- 16.45%
- YTD
- 63.83%
- 6M
- 64.57%
- 1Y
- 130.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.06%
- 5Y*
- 36.20%
- 10Y*
- 28.49%
ARAW.DE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 36.73%
- 1Y
- 137.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 63.83% | 42.34% |
ARAW.DE abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF | 26.31% | 94.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSMC.DE and ARAW.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LSMC.DE
ARAW.DE
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSMC.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.60 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.37 | 6.69 | +3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.83 | 25.81 | +7.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSMC.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27 | 4.36 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 4.33 | -3.51 |
Drawdowns
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.77%, which is greater than ARAW.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSMC.DE and ARAW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSMC.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.77% | -20.41% | -19.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -20.41% | +7.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.34% | -4.46% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -3.15% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 5.30% | -1.34% |
Volatility
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) and abrdn Future Raw Materials UCITS ETF (ARAW.DE) have volatilities of 11.23% and 11.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSMC.DE | ARAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 11.01% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 25.93% | -3.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.40% | 31.38% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 30.66% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 30.66% | -4.60% |
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LSMC.DE and ARAW.DE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
LSMC.DE vs. ARAW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSMC.DE nor ARAW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSMC.DE and ARAW.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LSMC.DE and ARAW.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
LSMC.DE is categorized as Semiconductors, while ARAW.DE is Materials. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and abrdn.
Find the right allocation for LSMC.DE and ARAW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer