PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSITX vs. VRGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund Class IS (LSITX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSITX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, LSITX has underperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 13.97%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.70% annualized return.


LSITX

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.60%
6M
-0.56%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
13.97%
ALL TIME*
14.51%

VRGWX

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.64%
6M
-0.96%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*
17.70%
ALL TIME*
16.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSITX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund Class IS
0.10%8.85%28.07%45.55%-32.69%22.15%31.32%32.22%-0.05%25.55%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
-0.71%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between LSITX and VRGWX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2013

0.97

The correlation between LSITX and VRGWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSITX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSITX
LSITX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
LSITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSITX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LSITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSITX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund Class IS (LSITX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSITXVRGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.08

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

0.44

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

1.35

-1.18

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSITX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSITX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSITX drawdown since its inception was -38.08%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSITX and VRGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSITXVRGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.08%

-32.70%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-16.19%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-23.44%

+2.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.08%

-32.70%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.08%

-32.70%

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-8.91%

+2.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-4.88%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

5.27%

+0.43%

Volatility

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund Class IS (LSITX) is 4.54%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that LSITX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSITXVRGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

6.24%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

13.60%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

17.16%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

21.88%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

21.27%

-0.75%

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSITX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSITX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

LSITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than VRGWX's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSITX
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Fund Class IS
9.46%10.22%4.45%10.37%7.99%10.85%5.63%4.86%4.00%4.29%2.18%3.00%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.49%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, LSITX and VRGWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRGWX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to LSITX (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSITX dropped -38.08% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

VRGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSITX and VRGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer