PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSIIX vs. VBMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VBMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSIIX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than VBMPX's 0.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LSIIX has outperformed VBMPX with an annualized return of 3.13%, while VBMPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.58% annualized return.


LSIIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.33%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
3.13%

VBMPX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
0.19%
10Y*
1.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
0.25%5.58%2.91%7.50%-11.31%0.18%11.60%9.04%-0.31%6.65%
VBMPX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
0.43%7.18%1.27%5.75%-13.14%-1.95%7.75%8.74%-0.24%3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LSIIX and VBMPX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2010

0.64

The correlation between LSIIX and VBMPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSIIX vs. VBMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSIIX
LSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
LSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

VBMPX
VBMPX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VBMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VBMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VBMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSIIXVBMPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.91

-0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.94

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.62

5.87

-2.25

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the VBMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSIIX and VBMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSIIXVBMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.27

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.03

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.32

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

0.52

+0.62

Drawdowns

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSIIX drawdown since its inception was -20.77%, which is greater than VBMPX's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIIX and VBMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSIIXVBMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-18.90%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.89%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.45%

-5.99%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.62%

-18.12%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.62%

-18.90%

+3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-2.23%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-3.53%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

0.96%

+0.20%

Volatility

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VBMPX) have volatilities of 1.34% and 1.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSIIXVBMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

1.38%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

2.80%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

3.98%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.28%

6.02%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

4.99%

-0.47%

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSIIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VBMPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSIIX vs. VBMPX - Dividend Comparison

LSIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than VBMPX's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSIIX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y
3.54%3.68%4.86%4.25%3.32%4.10%8.20%3.56%2.18%4.10%6.71%3.91%
VBMPX
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
4.00%3.88%3.69%3.11%2.61%1.81%2.41%2.75%2.58%2.58%2.55%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSIIX and VBMPX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBMPX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to LSIIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSIIX dropped -20.77% vs VBMPX's -18.90%.

VBMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSIIX and VBMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer