LSGRX vs. IMANX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Iman Fund (IMANX).
LSGRX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on May 16, 1991. IMANX is managed by Allied Asset. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | -10.93% | 14.01% | 35.21% | 51.30% | -27.86% | 18.68% | 31.76% | 31.73% | -2.56% | 32.63% |
IMANX Iman Fund | 0.26% | 17.91% | 20.60% | 29.36% | -29.79% | 17.07% | 19.88% | 34.69% | -6.17% | 28.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGRX achieves a -10.93% return, which is significantly lower than IMANX's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, LSGRX has outperformed IMANX with an annualized return of 15.50%, while IMANX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.48% annualized return.
LSGRX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- -10.93%
- 6M
- -11.38%
- 1Y
- 11.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
IMANX
- 1D
- 3.60%
- 1M
- -3.94%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 25.39%
- 3Y*
- 17.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than IMANX's 1.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSGRX vs. IMANX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGRX
IMANX
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) and Iman Fund (IMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSGRX | IMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.32 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.07 | 1.98 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.17 | -2.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 9.61 | -9.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSGRX | IMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.32 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.40 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.61 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.29 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGRX and IMANX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Dividend Comparison
LSGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than IMANX's 0.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund | 2.49% | 2.22% | 5.62% | 6.02% | 16.47% | 4.73% | 4.41% | 2.70% | 5.82% | 2.41% | 1.48% | 0.54% |
IMANX Iman Fund | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 20.20% | 2.72% | 12.50% | 12.25% | 8.71% | 7.93% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGRX drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than IMANX's maximum drawdown of -56.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGRX and IMANX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGRX | IMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -56.64% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.83% | -12.65% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.69% | -36.32% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.69% | -36.32% | +1.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -7.36% | -6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -16.81% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.88% | 2.85% | +5.03% |
Volatility
LSGRX vs. IMANX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LSGRX) is 6.52%, while Iman Fund (IMANX) has a volatility of 6.90%. This indicates that LSGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSGRX | IMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 6.90% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 12.32% | +0.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.19% | 20.52% | +4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 20.59% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 20.68% | +0.18% |