PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSFYX vs. XPTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSFYX achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than XPTFX's 2.83% return.


LSFYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.31%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
4.15%

XPTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.46%
1Y
7.55%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
6.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSFYX
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund
1.31%4.80%8.60%9.78%-5.52%4.88%1.47%5.43%0.40%4.62%
XPTFX
Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund
2.83%7.47%8.62%8.55%3.74%1.91%2.18%4.70%4.47%-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between LSFYX and XPTFX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.11

The correlation between LSFYX and XPTFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSFYX vs. XPTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSFYX
LSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
LSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XPTFX
XPTFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XPTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
XPTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSFYXXPTFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

2.58

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.70

3.73

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

4.27

-2.75

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.87

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.48

12.16

-1.69

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSFYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the XPTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSFYX and XPTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSFYXXPTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.58

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

2.55

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

2.36

-0.81

Drawdowns

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSFYX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, which is greater than XPTFX's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSFYX and XPTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSFYXXPTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-2.95%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-1.96%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-2.95%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.60%

-2.95%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.14%

-0.26%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.62%

-0.02%

Volatility

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) at 0.21%. This indicates that LSFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSFYXXPTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.21%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

2.89%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72%

2.94%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.00%

2.52%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

2.02%

+1.47%

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSFYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than XPTFX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSFYX vs. XPTFX - Dividend Comparison

LSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than XPTFX's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSFYX
Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund
7.27%7.09%9.23%6.81%5.17%3.87%5.18%6.46%6.07%5.67%5.89%6.23%
XPTFX
Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund
6.04%7.24%6.78%6.66%5.70%2.21%2.74%4.62%4.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSFYX and XPTFX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSFYX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to XPTFX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSFYX dropped -20.67% vs XPTFX's -2.95%.

XPTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSFYX and XPTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer