LSFYX vs. LSIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX).
LSFYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Sep 29, 2011. LSIIX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996.
Performance
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFYX Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund | -1.15% | 4.80% | 8.60% | 9.78% | -5.52% | 4.88% | 1.47% | 5.43% | 0.40% | 5.06% |
LSIIX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y | -1.33% | 5.58% | 2.91% | 7.50% | -11.31% | 0.18% | 11.60% | 9.04% | -0.31% | 6.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSFYX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly higher than LSIIX's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LSFYX has outperformed LSIIX with an annualized return of 4.34%, while LSIIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.12% annualized return.
LSFYX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
LSIIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- 1Y
- 1.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSFYX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSFYX vs. LSIIX — Risk / Return Rank
LSFYX
LSIIX
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 0.57 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 0.80 | +1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 1.33 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 4.39 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 0.57 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.32 | 0.16 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.27 | 0.71 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.50 | 1.14 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSFYX and LSIIX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Dividend Comparison
LSFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than LSIIX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSFYX Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund | 6.64% | 7.09% | 9.23% | 6.81% | 5.17% | 3.87% | 5.18% | 6.46% | 6.07% | 5.67% | 5.89% | 6.23% |
LSIIX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y | 2.97% | 3.68% | 4.86% | 4.25% | 3.32% | 4.10% | 8.20% | 3.56% | 2.18% | 4.10% | 6.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSFYX drawdown since its inception was -20.67%, roughly equal to the maximum LSIIX drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSFYX and LSIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.67% | -20.77% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.35% | -3.23% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | -15.62% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.67% | -15.62% | -5.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -2.89% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -2.42% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.98% | -0.25% |
Volatility
LSFYX vs. LSIIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund (LSFYX) is 0.88%, while Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that LSFYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 1.36% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 2.75% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 4.75% | -1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 5.23% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 4.51% | -1.03% |