LR.PA vs. ETN
Compare and contrast key facts about Legrand SA (LR.PA) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).
Performance
LR.PA vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LR.PA vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR.PA Legrand SA | 8.72% | 38.10% | 2.03% | 28.48% | -25.80% | 43.28% | 2.74% | 50.70% | -22.07% | 21.33% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 16.90% | -14.33% | 48.72% | 51.54% | -1.43% | 57.68% | 19.17% | 45.99% | -5.82% | 6.60% |
Different Trading Currencies
LR.PA is traded in EUR, while ETN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ETN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LR.PA achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 16.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LR.PA has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 13.29%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.80% annualized return.
LR.PA
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 43.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
ETN
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 23.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LR.PA vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
LR.PA
ETN
LR.PA vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legrand SA (LR.PA) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LR.PA | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 0.69 | +0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.16 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.15 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 1.30 | +1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.10 | 2.81 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LR.PA | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.69 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.81 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.73 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.51 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between LR.PA and ETN is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LR.PA vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
LR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than ETN's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR.PA Legrand SA | 1.59% | 1.73% | 2.22% | 2.02% | 2.21% | 1.38% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.89% | 1.85% | 2.13% | 2.09% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
LR.PA vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LR.PA drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, smaller than the maximum ETN drawdown of -65.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LR.PA and ETN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LR.PA | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.19% | -68.95% | +10.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.71% | -19.14% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.14% | -34.46% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.14% | -44.55% | +8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.63% | -7.42% | -3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.26% | -14.93% | +3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 8.58% | -0.41% |
Volatility
LR.PA vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
Legrand SA (LR.PA) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 9.84%. This indicates that LR.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LR.PA | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.04% | 9.84% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.59% | 23.33% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.61% | 35.94% | -7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 29.31% | -5.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.76% | 29.96% | -6.20% |
Financials
LR.PA vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Legrand SA and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities