PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQTI vs. TLTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LQTI vs. TLTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LQTI vs. TLTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQTI achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly lower than TLTP's 0.13% return.


LQTI

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
4.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTP

1D
-0.07%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.21%
1Y
0.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LQTI vs. TLTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTP's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LQTI vs. TLTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTP
TLTP Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TLTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTP Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQTI vs. TLTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQTITLTPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.06

+0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.02

0.15

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.02

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.14

+1.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.15

0.31

+3.83

LQTI vs. TLTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the TLTP Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQTI and TLTP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQTITLTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.06

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.09

+0.81

Correlation

The correlation between LQTI and TLTP is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LQTI vs. TLTP - Dividend Comparison

LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, less than TLTP's 12.79% yield.


Drawdowns

LQTI vs. TLTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, smaller than the maximum TLTP drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and TLTP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LQTITLTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-8.54%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-8.52%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-3.27%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-3.25%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

3.73%

-2.61%

Volatility

LQTI vs. TLTP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) is 2.66%, while Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that LQTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LQTITLTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

3.18%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.87%

5.14%

-1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

9.34%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.11%

10.16%

-4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.11%

10.16%

-4.05%