LQTI vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for ARMW.

Performance

LQTI vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQTI achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 336.58% return.

LQTI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -5.75%
• 1M: 108.38%
• YTD: 336.58%
• 6M: 222.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQTI vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.63%	-0.49%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	336.58%	-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LQTI and ARMW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025	0.23

Return for Risk

LQTI vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 31
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQTI vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LQTI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LQTI	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	4.33	-3.38

Drawdowns

LQTI vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQTI drawdown since its inception was -3.41%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQTI and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LQTI	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-48.47%	+45.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.97%	-5.75%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-26.42%	+25.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LQTI	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	88.57%	-83.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	88.57%	-82.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.97%	88.57%	-82.60%

LQTI vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LQTI vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

LQTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.07%, less than ARMW's 16.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	16.13%	16.38%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LQTI and ARMW in my portfolio?

LQTI and ARMW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LQTI or ARMW?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LQTI or ARMW?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LQTI or ARMW?

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 16.13%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between LQTI and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LQTI and 0.99% for ARMW.