PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQQ3.L achieves a 56.49% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's 19.86% return.


LQQ3.L

1D
-1.92%
1M
27.07%
YTD
56.49%
6M
51.01%
1Y
126.98%
3Y*
59.92%
5Y*
28.14%
10Y*

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
9.63%
YTD
19.86%
6M
18.38%
1Y
41.62%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
22.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
56.49%18.96%62.50%192.06%-77.11%89.86%102.98%121.83%-16.83%48.85%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.86%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LQQ3.L and EQQQ.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2017

0.93

The correlation between LQQ3.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQQ3.L
LQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQQ3.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

3.78

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

11.13

-0.63

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQQ3.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQQ3.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.99

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.92

-0.26

Drawdowns

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -79.16%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQQ3.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQQ3.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.16%

-33.75%

-45.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-10.97%

-24.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.39%

-24.09%

-34.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.16%

-27.76%

-51.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.63%

-1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.34%

-5.61%

-17.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.04%

3.73%

+8.31%

Volatility

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) has a higher volatility of 13.74% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.15%. This indicates that LQQ3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQQ3.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

4.15%

+9.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.87%

10.33%

+22.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.12%

14.70%

+30.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.25%

19.14%

+40.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.45%

19.35%

+40.10%

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LQQ3.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

LQQ3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
LQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, LQQ3.L and EQQQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LQQ3.L.

LQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQQ3.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQQ3.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer