PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQQ3.L achieves a 40.28% return, which is significantly higher than 3BAL.L's 21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LQQ3.L has outperformed 3BAL.L with an annualized return of 40.57%, while 3BAL.L has yielded a comparatively lower 19.55% annualized return.


LQQ3.L

1D
1.33%
1M
-9.78%
YTD
40.28%
6M
39.26%
1Y
85.09%
3Y*
50.72%
5Y*
20.69%
10Y*
40.57%

3BAL.L

1D
-1.23%
1M
15.53%
YTD
21.01%
6M
25.49%
1Y
162.00%
3Y*
140.36%
5Y*
72.59%
10Y*
19.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LQQ3.L
WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged
40.28%18.96%62.50%192.06%-77.11%89.86%123.48%121.83%-16.64%64.74%
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
21.01%433.07%68.07%63.85%-24.90%108.27%-79.89%25.77%-70.96%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LQQ3.L and 3BAL.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQQ3.L
LQQ3.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LQQ3.L3BAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.54

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

9.50

-2.64

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQQ3.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQQ3.L and 3BAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQQ3.L drawdown since its inception was -79.16%, smaller than the maximum 3BAL.L drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQQ3.L and 3BAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQQ3.L3BAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.16%

-99.29%

+20.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-45.44%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.39%

-50.31%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.16%

-77.94%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.16%

-97.78%

+18.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.13%

-49.38%

+37.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-81.98%

+63.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

16.98%

-4.63%

Volatility

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree NASDAQ 100 3x Daily Leveraged (LQQ3.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) have volatilities of 18.54% and 18.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQQ3.L3BAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.54%

18.61%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.91%

55.83%

-18.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.97%

68.85%

-20.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.29%

75.02%

-13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.95%

82.75%

-23.80%

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQQ3.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than 3BAL.L's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

LQQ3.L vs. 3BAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LQQ3.L nor 3BAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LQQ3.L and 3BAL.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LQQ3.L is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LQQ3.L is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

LQQ3.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while 3BAL.L is Leveraged Equities. LQQ3.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Notional Net Total Return Index, while 3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for LQQ3.L and 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQQ3.L and 3BAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer