LQDI vs. WIP
LQDI (iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and WIP (SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. LQDI is actively managed, while WIP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LQDI returned 1.93%/yr vs -0.70%/yr for WIP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WIP.
Performance
LQDI vs. WIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than WIP's 4.31% return.
LQDI
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 7.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.93%
- 10Y*
- —
WIP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.70%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
LQDI vs. WIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.72% | 8.84% | 1.48% | 8.85% | -15.33% | 7.53% | 11.82% | 15.83% | -2.07% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 4.31% | 15.18% | -8.71% | 8.84% | -15.54% | -4.15% | 8.37% | 8.62% | -4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDI and WIP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2018 | 0.42 |
The correlation between LQDI and WIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDI vs. WIP — Risk / Return Rank
LQDI
WIP
LQDI vs. WIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) and SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDI | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 2.00 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 5.98 | +1.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDI | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.18 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | -0.06 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.12 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
LQDI vs. WIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDI drawdown since its inception was -28.99%, roughly equal to the maximum WIP drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDI and WIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDI | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.99% | -29.60% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -5.16% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.27% | -11.16% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -28.84% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -3.87% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -8.58% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.72% | -0.77% |
Volatility
LQDI vs. WIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) is 1.20%, while SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that LQDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDI | WIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 2.95% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.44% | 6.89% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 8.72% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.18% | 11.45% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 10.16% | +0.68% |
LQDI vs. WIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WIP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQDI vs. WIP - Dividend Comparison
LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than WIP's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.58% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WIP SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF | 5.79% | 5.51% | 6.06% | 6.54% | 11.15% | 4.63% | 1.59% | 2.49% | 4.05% | 1.91% | 1.27% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDI and WIP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WIP has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to LQDI (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDI dropped -28.99% vs WIP's -29.60%.
On 5-year performance, LQDI leads with 1.93% vs -0.70% for WIP. On fees, LQDI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, LQDI has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LQDI has performed better with a 1.93% return vs -0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LQDI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WIP.
WIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.79%, compared with 4.58% for LQDI.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for LQDI and 0.50% for WIP.
LQDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDI and WIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer