LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L
LQDA.L (iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and VUCP.L (Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from iShares and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LQDA.L returned -0.01%/yr vs -0.05%/yr for VUCP.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LQDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VUCP.L.
Performance
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LQDA.L is traded in USD, while VUCP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUCP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDA.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than VUCP.L's -0.21% return.
LQDA.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
VUCP.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.02% | 8.01% | 1.25% | 8.99% | -17.75% | -1.66% | 10.56% | 18.22% | -4.30% | 4.45% |
VUCP.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | -0.21% | 6.57% | 2.58% | 6.64% | -15.50% | -1.53% | 8.17% | 14.64% | -3.57% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDA.L and VUCP.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between LQDA.L and VUCP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L — Risk / Return Rank
LQDA.L
VUCP.L
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.32 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 3.99 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.80 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | -0.01 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.30 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, which is greater than VUCP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA.L and VUCP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -22.06% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -3.31% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.86% | -6.13% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -21.99% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -3.31% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -5.68% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 1.10% | +0.10% |
Volatility
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VUCP.L) at 1.74%. This indicates that LQDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDA.L | VUCP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 1.74% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 4.11% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 5.52% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 7.64% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 7.73% | +1.38% |
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUCP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDA.L vs. VUCP.L - Dividend Comparison
LQDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUCP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUCP.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Distributing | 3.85% | 4.02% | 4.73% | 3.57% | 2.79% | 1.85% | 2.36% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 2.57% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDA.L and VUCP.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUCP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUCP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LQDA.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LQDA.L and 0.09% for VUCP.L.
Find the right allocation for LQDA.L and VUCP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer