LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L
LQDA.L (iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and SUSU.L (iShares USD Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - LQDA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while SUSU.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LQDA.L returned -0.01%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for SUSU.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SUSU.L.
Performance
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDA.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than SUSU.L's 1.03% return.
LQDA.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
SUSU.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.02% | 8.01% | 1.25% | 8.99% | -17.75% | -1.66% | 10.56% | 18.22% | -0.27% |
SUSU.L iShares USD Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.03% | 5.50% | 5.39% | 5.24% | -2.13% | -0.20% | 3.23% | 4.25% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDA.L and SUSU.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2018 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
LQDA.L
SUSU.L
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) and iShares USD Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDA.L | SUSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.63 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 6.38 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 28.73 | -24.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDA.L | SUSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 3.00 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.98 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.93 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDA.L drawdown since its inception was -25.10%, which is greater than SUSU.L's maximum drawdown of -8.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA.L and SUSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDA.L | SUSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -8.33% | -16.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.32% | -0.65% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.86% | -1.36% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.10% | -4.60% | -20.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.58% | -0.08% | -3.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -0.63% | -6.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 0.14% | +1.06% |
Volatility
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (LQDA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.23% compared to iShares USD Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUSU.L) at 0.46%. This indicates that LQDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDA.L | SUSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.23% | 0.46% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | 1.11% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 1.39% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.47% | 2.90% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 3.23% | +5.88% |
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDA.L vs. SUSU.L - Dividend Comparison
LQDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUSU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA.L iShares USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUSU.L iShares USD Corporate Bond 0-3yr ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.49% | 4.60% | 4.71% | 4.01% | 1.59% | 0.82% | 2.24% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDA.L and SUSU.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUSU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUSU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LQDA.L.
LQDA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while SUSU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LQDA.L and 0.12% for SUSU.L.
Find the right allocation for LQDA.L and SUSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer