PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOW vs. AMGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOW vs. AMGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOW achieves a -7.60% return, which is significantly lower than AMGN's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LOW has outperformed AMGN with an annualized return of 13.33%, while AMGN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.


LOW

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-7.60%
6M
-9.89%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
2.50%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
13.33%

AMGN

1D
0.32%
1M
8.85%
YTD
10.10%
6M
13.41%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOW vs. AMGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
-7.60%-0.33%13.01%14.03%-21.49%63.34%36.40%32.23%1.22%33.29%
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
10.10%29.67%-6.77%13.46%20.43%0.87%-1.99%27.60%15.23%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LOW and AMGN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOW:

$123.64B

AMGN:

$193.23B

EPS

LOW:

$11.86

AMGN:

$14.38

PE Ratio

LOW:

18.62

AMGN:

24.70

PEG Ratio

LOW:

20.34

AMGN:

1.42

PS Ratio

LOW:

1.40

AMGN:

5.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOW:

$88.43B

AMGN:

$37.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOW:

$29.89B

AMGN:

$26.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

LOW:

$11.50B

AMGN:

$17.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOW vs. AMGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOW
LOW Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOW Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AMGN
AMGN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOW vs. AMGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOWAMGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.17

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

1.40

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.06

3.22

-3.16

LOW vs. AMGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the AMGN Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOW and AMGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOW vs. AMGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOW drawdown since its inception was -62.52%, roughly equal to the maximum AMGN drawdown of -63.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOW and AMGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOWAMGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.52%

-63.48%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.75%

-16.57%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.75%

-22.74%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.86%

-24.86%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.63%

-24.86%

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.81%

-7.80%

-15.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-16.77%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.31%

7.19%

+5.12%

Volatility

LOW vs. AMGN - Volatility Comparison

Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) and Amgen Inc. (AMGN) have volatilities of 8.08% and 7.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOWAMGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

7.92%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.39%

19.22%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.16%

27.79%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.23%

23.97%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.17%

24.86%

+4.31%

Dividends

LOW vs. AMGN - Dividend Comparison

LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than AMGN's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.76%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
2.17%1.95%1.82%1.93%1.86%1.08%1.40%1.72%1.93%1.64%1.77%1.34%

Financials

LOW vs. AMGN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Amgen Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
23.08B
8.62B
(LOW) Total Revenue
(AMGN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LOW vs. AMGN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Amgen Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
32.7%
68.2%
Portfolio components
LOW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.54B and revenue of 23.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

AMGN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.87B and revenue of 8.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

LOW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.55B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

AMGN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

LOW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lowe's Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 23.08B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

AMGN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amgen Inc. reported a net income of 1.82B and revenue of 8.62B, resulting in a net margin of 21.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOW and AMGN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOW has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to AMGN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOW dropped -62.52% vs AMGN's -63.48%.

AMGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOW and AMGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer