LOUP vs. BUFF
LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LOUP returned 12.98%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOUP charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
LOUP vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -19.72% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 32.32% | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOUP and BUFF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.68 |
The correlation between LOUP and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
LOUP vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LOUP
BUFF
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
LOUP
BUFF
Industrials
LOUP
BUFF
Communication Services
LOUP
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
LOUP
BUFF
Financial Services
LOUP
BUFF
Energy
LOUP
BUFF
Utilities
LOUP
BUFF
Healthcare
LOUP
BUFF
Basic Materials
LOUP
-
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
LOUP
-
BUFF
Real Estate
LOUP
-
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOUP vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
LOUP
BUFF
LOUP vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOUP | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.66 | 2.80 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.21 | 4.24 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.58 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 4.02 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 21.50 | -9.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOUP | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 2.80 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 1.04 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
LOUP vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than BUFF's maximum drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOUP | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -46.23% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.00% | -3.58% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.23% | -10.24% | -24.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.63% | -10.24% | -45.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -0.27% | -1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.04% | -6.18% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | 0.67% | +5.52% |
Volatility
LOUP vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOUP | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.23% | 1.02% | +7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 3.83% | +18.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.51% | 5.15% | +23.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.38% | 8.41% | +23.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.96% | 17.67% | +14.29% |
LOUP vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOUP vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither LOUP nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOUP and BUFF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 12.98% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
LOUP and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOUP and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer