PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOUP vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOUP vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOUP achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 6.26% return.


LOUP

1D
-1.29%
1M
-11.40%
6M
9.89%
YTD
11.39%
1Y
37.12%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.49%

BUFF

1D
0.26%
1M
0.67%
6M
5.31%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
11.19%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.70M$5.20M$4.32M
$926.73K$920.97K$1.38M

LOUP vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
11.39%43.24%21.80%51.31%-46.00%7.54%86.25%31.76%-18.86%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
6.26%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LOUP and BUFF is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.68

The correlation between LOUP and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOUP vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LOUP vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOUPBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.42

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

3.15

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.59

16.12

-11.53

LOUP vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOUP Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOUP and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOUP vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOUP drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than BUFF's maximum drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOUP and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOUPBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-46.23%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

-3.58%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.23%

-10.24%

-24.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

-10.24%

-45.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.75%

-0.15%

-14.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.79%

-6.09%

-13.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.09%

0.70%

+6.39%

Volatility

LOUP vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.47%. This indicates that LOUP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOUPBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

1.47%

+8.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.04%

4.22%

+20.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.22%

5.31%

+25.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.84%

8.45%

+24.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.07%

17.54%

+14.53%

LOUP vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOUP has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOUP vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither LOUP nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
LOUP
Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOUP and BUFF have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOUP has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to BUFF (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOUP dropped -58.68% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 10.70% vs 8.65% for BUFF. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 10.70% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

LOUP and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

LOUP is categorized as Technology Equities, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index, while BUFF tracks FTSE Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LOUP and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOUP and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer