LOTI vs. QQWZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

LOTI (Liberty One Tactical Income ETF) and QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LOTI is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Liberty One, while QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LOTI charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQWZ.

Performance

LOTI vs. QQWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOTI achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than QQWZ's 15.98% return.

LOTI

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 5.54%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQWZ

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 11.67%
• YTD: 15.98%
• 1Y: 27.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOTI vs. QQWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF	5.19%	1.06%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	15.98%	1.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LOTI and QQWZ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

LOTI vs. QQWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 70
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOTI vs. QQWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI) and Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LOTI	QQWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.39	—

Drawdowns

LOTI vs. QQWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOTI drawdown since its inception was -4.42%, smaller than the maximum QQWZ drawdown of -7.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOTI and QQWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LOTI	QQWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.42%	-7.81%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-2.71%	+1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-1.53%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LOTI	QQWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.91%	16.13%	-10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.91%	16.09%	-10.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.91%	16.09%	-10.18%

LOTI vs. QQWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOTI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

LOTI vs. QQWZ - Dividend Comparison

LOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than QQWZ's 0.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF	1.58%	0.45%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.56%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LOTI and QQWZ in my portfolio?

LOTI and QQWZ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LOTI or QQWZ?

On fees, QQWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LOTI or QQWZ?

QQWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for LOTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LOTI or QQWZ?

LOTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.56% for QQWZ.

What is the main difference between LOTI and QQWZ?

LOTI is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while QQWZ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Liberty One and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for LOTI and 0.49% for QQWZ.