LOTI vs. CEFZ
LOTI (Liberty One Tactical Income ETF) and CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOTI charges 1.01%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for CEFZ.
Performance
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOTI achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than CEFZ's 5.56% return.
LOTI
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEFZ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF | 5.19% | 1.06% |
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 5.56% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOTI and CEFZ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liberty One Tactical Income ETF (LOTI) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOTI drawdown since its inception was -4.42%, smaller than the maximum CEFZ drawdown of -6.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOTI and CEFZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOTI | CEFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -6.66% | +2.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -0.81% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -1.20% | -0.12% |
Volatility
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOTI | CEFZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.91% | 10.39% | -4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 10.39% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 10.39% | -4.48% |
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOTI has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFZ's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOTI vs. CEFZ - Dividend Comparison
LOTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than CEFZ's 9.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF | 9.13% | 4.17% |
LOTI Liberty One Tactical Income ETF | 1.58% | 0.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOTI and CEFZ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOTI is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOTI is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.
CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 1.58% for LOTI.
They also come from different issuers: Liberty One and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for LOTI and 3.36% for CEFZ.
Find the right allocation for LOTI and CEFZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer