LOT vs. POWL
LOT (Lotus Technology Inc) and POWL (Powell Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. LOT operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while POWL operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past year, LOT returned -40.09% vs 419.37% for POWL. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOT vs. POWL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOT achieves a -7.80% return, which is significantly lower than POWL's 182.31% return.
LOT
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- -7.80%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- 1Y
- -40.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POWL
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 11.07%
- YTD
- 182.31%
- 6M
- 178.20%
- 1Y
- 419.37%
- 3Y*
- 145.78%
- 5Y*
- 95.35%
- 10Y*
- 41.47%
LOT vs. POWL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LOT Lotus Technology Inc | -7.80% | -60.94% | -73.28% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 182.31% | 44.49% | 42.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOT and POWL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2024 | 0.08 |
The correlation between LOT and POWL shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LOT:
$843.10M
POWL:
$10.95B
LOT:
-$0.71
POWL:
$5.12
LOT:
1.63
POWL:
9.67
LOT:
$519.10M
POWL:
$1.13B
LOT:
$45.21M
POWL:
$340.78M
LOT:
-$368.46M
POWL:
$236.11M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOT vs. POWL — Risk / Return Rank
LOT
POWL
LOT vs. POWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lotus Technology Inc (LOT) and Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOT | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.67 | -0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 13.69 | -14.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 44.07 | -45.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOT | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 7.24 | -7.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 0.29 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
LOT vs. POWL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOT drawdown since its inception was -92.49%, which is greater than POWL's maximum drawdown of -73.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOT and POWL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOT | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.49% | -73.10% | -19.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.04% | -30.88% | -27.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.88% | -6.90% | -83.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.12% | -36.12% | -40.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.51% | 9.57% | +29.94% |
Volatility
LOT vs. POWL - Volatility Comparison
Lotus Technology Inc (LOT) has a higher volatility of 26.58% compared to Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) at 19.61%. This indicates that LOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOT | POWL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.58% | 19.61% | +6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.16% | 42.55% | +5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.92% | 58.36% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.34% | 64.06% | +21.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.34% | 54.66% | +30.68% |
Dividends
LOT vs. POWL - Dividend Comparison
LOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOT Lotus Technology Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POWL Powell Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.34% | 0.48% | 1.19% | 2.96% | 3.53% | 3.53% | 2.12% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 2.67% | 4.00% |
Financials
LOT vs. POWL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lotus Technology Inc and Powell Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LOT vs. POWL - Profitability Comparison
LOT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lotus Technology Inc reported a gross profit of 16.52M and revenue of 163.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.1%.
POWL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 87.94M and revenue of 296.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.
LOT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lotus Technology Inc reported an operating income of -117.05M and revenue of 163.98M, resulting in an operating margin of -71.4%.
POWL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 57.58M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.4%.
LOT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lotus Technology Inc reported a net income of -86.07M and revenue of 163.98M, resulting in a net margin of -52.5%.
POWL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Powell Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.89M and revenue of 296.62M, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LOT and POWL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOT has higher volatility (26.58%) compared to POWL (19.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOT dropped -92.49% vs POWL's -73.10%.
POWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.24 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOT and POWL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer