LOPP vs. CTEF
LOPP (Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF) and CTEF (Castellan Targeted Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LOPP charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTEF.
Performance
LOPP vs. CTEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOPP achieves a 15.77% return, which is significantly lower than CTEF's 29.88% return.
LOPP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 15.77%
- 6M
- 17.00%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 29.88%
- 6M
- 31.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOPP vs. CTEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 15.77% | 15.47% |
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 29.88% | 33.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOPP and CTEF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOPP vs. CTEF — Risk / Return Rank
LOPP
CTEF
LOPP vs. CTEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF (LOPP) and Castellan Targeted Equity ETF (CTEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LOPP | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LOPP | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 3.59 | -3.03 |
Drawdowns
LOPP vs. CTEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOPP drawdown since its inception was -25.28%, which is greater than CTEF's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOPP and CTEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOPP | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.28% | -15.00% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | 0.00% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -1.80% | -6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility
LOPP vs. CTEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOPP | CTEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 21.84% | -5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 21.84% | -3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 21.84% | -4.15% |
LOPP vs. CTEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOPP has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CTEF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOPP vs. CTEF - Dividend Comparison
LOPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than CTEF's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEF Castellan Targeted Equity ETF | 0.06% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LOPP Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF | 0.72% | 0.83% | 1.88% | 2.23% | 2.01% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOPP and CTEF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOPP is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOPP is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTEF.
LOPP has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.06% for CTEF.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for LOPP and 0.45% for CTEF.
Find the right allocation for LOPP and CTEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer