LOFF vs. TECL
LOFF (Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF) and TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. LOFF is actively managed, while TECL is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOFF charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for TECL.
Performance
LOFF vs. TECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOFF
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -47.69%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TECL
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -14.11%
- 6M
- 49.26%
- YTD
- 50.99%
- 1Y
- 85.10%
- 3Y*
- 48.81%
- 5Y*
- 24.82%
- 10Y*
- 46.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 46.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.23M | $19.42M | $33.43M | |
| $129.93M | $155.70M | $225.58M |
LOFF vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOFF Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF | -60.77% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | -17.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOFF and TECL is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOFF vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank
LOFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TECL
LOFF vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF (LOFF) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOFF | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOFF vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOFF drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOFF and TECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOFF | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.97% | -77.96% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -66.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.97% | -35.15% | -35.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.12% | -18.42% | -27.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.74% | — |
Volatility
LOFF vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOFF | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 25.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 63.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.72% | 73.86% | +95.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.72% | 76.16% | +93.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.72% | 73.32% | +96.40% |
LOFF vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOFF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOFF vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison
LOFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than TECL's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOFF Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 4.71% | 7.19% | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.52% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOFF and TECL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LOFF.
TECL has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 0.09% for LOFF.
Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LOFF and 0.91% for TECL.
Find the right allocation for LOFF and TECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer