LOFF vs. QQQE
LOFF (Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF) and QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - LOFF is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. LOFF is actively managed, while QQQE is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LOFF charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QQQE.
Performance
LOFF vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LOFF
- 1D
- -5.94%
- 1M
- -47.69%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQQE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 16.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 14.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.23M | $19.42M | $33.43M | |
| $21.63M | $23.94M | $23.54M |
LOFF vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LOFF Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF | -60.77% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | -3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOFF and QQQE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2026 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOFF vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank
LOFF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQE
LOFF vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF (LOFF) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOFF | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOFF vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOFF drawdown since its inception was -70.97%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOFF and QQQE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOFF | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.97% | -32.14% | -38.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.97% | -5.81% | -65.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.12% | -5.14% | -40.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility
LOFF vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOFF | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 169.72% | 15.96% | +153.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.72% | 20.58% | +149.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.72% | 20.75% | +148.97% |
LOFF vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LOFF has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
LOFF vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison
LOFF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than QQQE's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOFF Direxion Daily SpaceX Bull 2X ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.59% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOFF and QQQE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LOFF.
QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.09% for LOFF.
LOFF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for LOFF and 0.35% for QQQE.
Find the right allocation for LOFF and QQQE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer