PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMWE.DE achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LMWE.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 2.38%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


LMWE.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.23%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.38%

LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
7.96%
YTD
20.63%
6M
18.72%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMWE.DE
Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)
7.51%-2.27%4.83%3.20%-20.69%36.10%-17.30%22.98%-1.37%-2.23%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between LMWE.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2010

0.44

The correlation between LMWE.DE and LYMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMWE.DE
LMWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMWE.DELYMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

3.77

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

11.23

-7.27

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMWE.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMWE.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.40

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.94

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

1.08

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.77

-0.36

Drawdowns

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMWE.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMWE.DE and LYMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMWE.DELYMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-50.00%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-10.02%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

-26.74%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

-31.12%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

-31.12%

-11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

-0.86%

-10.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-8.78%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.37%

-0.95%

Volatility

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) is 2.75%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that LMWE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMWE.DELYMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

4.37%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

10.99%

-2.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

15.73%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

19.91%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

19.68%

-2.74%

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMWE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMWE.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMWE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LMWE.DE
Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)
2.42%2.61%3.75%0.00%4.18%2.22%3.76%3.37%3.76%3.44%3.65%4.01%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMWE.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LMWE.DE.

LMWE.DE is categorized as REIT, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. LMWE.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LMWE.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMWE.DE and LYMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer