PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LMWE.DE having a 7.51% return and H4Z7.DE slightly higher at 7.83%.


LMWE.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.23%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.38%

H4Z7.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
7.83%
6M
7.26%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LMWE.DE
Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)
7.51%-2.27%4.83%3.20%-13.32%
H4Z7.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
7.83%-1.78%5.80%7.39%-13.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LMWE.DE and H4Z7.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.90

The correlation between LMWE.DE and H4Z7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMWE.DE
LMWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

H4Z7.DE
H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMWE.DEH4Z7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.23

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

3.99

-0.03

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMWE.DE and H4Z7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMWE.DEH4Z7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.86

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.08

+0.33

Drawdowns

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMWE.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than H4Z7.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMWE.DE and H4Z7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMWE.DEH4Z7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-26.78%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-7.86%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

-20.13%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

-2.86%

-8.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-11.53%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.42%

0.00%

Volatility

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) have volatilities of 2.75% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMWE.DEH4Z7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.87%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

8.56%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

11.25%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

14.42%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

14.42%

+2.52%

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMWE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than H4Z7.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMWE.DE vs. H4Z7.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMWE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while H4Z7.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4Z7.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMWE.DE
Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)
2.42%2.61%3.75%0.00%4.18%2.22%3.76%3.37%3.76%3.44%3.65%4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LMWE.DE and H4Z7.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4Z7.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4Z7.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LMWE.DE.

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LMWE.DE and 0.24% for H4Z7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMWE.DE and H4Z7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer