LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE
LMWE.DE (Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)) and EEPG.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds - LMWE.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed while EEPG.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LMWE.DE returned 0.78%/yr vs -9.05%/yr for EEPG.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMWE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for EEPG.DE.
Performance
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMWE.DE achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than EEPG.DE's -3.00% return.
LMWE.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- 1Y
- 9.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
EEPG.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- -6.12%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- -9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMWE.DE Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) | 7.51% | -2.27% | 4.83% | 3.20% | -20.69% | 36.10% | -17.30% | -0.31% |
EEPG.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF | -3.00% | 3.23% | -11.24% | 14.85% | -39.69% | 10.89% | -9.26% | 4.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMWE.DE and EEPG.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between LMWE.DE and EEPG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LMWE.DE
EEPG.DE
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMWE.DE | EEPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | -0.40 | +1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | -0.93 | +4.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMWE.DE | EEPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | -0.39 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.38 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.27 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMWE.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, smaller than the maximum EEPG.DE drawdown of -52.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMWE.DE and EEPG.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMWE.DE | EEPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -52.41% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -16.02% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -23.61% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.69% | -52.41% | +21.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -42.84% | +31.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -31.56% | +20.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 6.85% | -4.43% |
Volatility
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) is 2.75%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF (EEPG.DE) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that LMWE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEPG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMWE.DE | EEPG.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.98% | -2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | 13.43% | -5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 16.33% | -4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 23.47% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 24.01% | -7.07% |
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMWE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EEPG.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMWE.DE vs. EEPG.DE - Dividend Comparison
LMWE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while EEPG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEPG.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMWE.DE Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) | 2.42% | 2.61% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 4.18% | 2.22% | 3.76% | 3.37% | 3.76% | 3.44% | 3.65% | 4.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMWE.DE and EEPG.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEPG.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEPG.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LMWE.DE.
LMWE.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while EEPG.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Europe ex UK Green. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LMWE.DE and 0.40% for EEPG.DE.
Find the right allocation for LMWE.DE and EEPG.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer