PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LMWE.DE having a 7.51% return and CSYZ.DE slightly lower at 7.36%.


LMWE.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
7.51%
6M
6.92%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.38%

CSYZ.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
7.36%
6M
6.96%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LMWE.DE
Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)
7.51%-2.27%4.83%3.20%-20.69%36.10%5.86%
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
7.36%-5.02%2.47%4.08%-19.53%36.67%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LMWE.DE and CSYZ.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.91

The correlation between LMWE.DE and CSYZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMWE.DE
LMWE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMWE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CSYZ.DE
CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMWE.DECSYZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.10

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

0.80

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

2.28

+1.68

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMWE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMWE.DE and CSYZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMWE.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.57

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.00

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.26

+0.15

Drawdowns

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMWE.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than CSYZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMWE.DE and CSYZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMWE.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-31.21%

-11.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-8.07%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

-20.14%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.69%

-31.21%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.34%

-15.10%

+3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-13.84%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.82%

-0.40%

Volatility

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) have volatilities of 2.75% and 2.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMWE.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.84%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.23%

8.54%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

11.29%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.24%

15.03%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

15.22%

+1.72%

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMWE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSYZ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMWE.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMWE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than CSYZ.DE's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
1.01%1.32%0.00%0.76%3.39%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMWE.DE
Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)
2.42%2.61%3.75%0.00%4.18%2.22%3.76%3.37%3.76%3.44%3.65%4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMWE.DE and CSYZ.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LMWE.DE.

LMWE.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LMWE.DE and 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMWE.DE and CSYZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer