PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMVYX vs. FIKNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVYX achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than FIKNX's 25.69% return.


LMVYX

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.11%
6M
8.95%
YTD
16.34%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
8.94%
ALL TIME*
11.80%

FIKNX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.91%
6M
19.82%
YTD
25.69%
1Y
39.03%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LMVYX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund
16.34%0.23%10.43%13.83%-15.05%27.60%8.57%20.63%-12.43%
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
25.69%8.18%8.00%17.97%-12.98%38.27%11.35%20.98%-13.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVYX and FIKNX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.95

The correlation between LMVYX and FIKNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMVYX vs. FIKNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMVYX
LMVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LMVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKNX
FIKNX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FIKNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMVYXFIKNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.39

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.25

12.14

-6.88

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FIKNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVYX and FIKNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVYX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than FIKNX's maximum drawdown of -44.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVYX and FIKNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMVYXFIKNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-44.09%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-10.35%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-24.87%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.97%

-24.87%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-2.37%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-7.53%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.89%

+1.00%

Volatility

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) is 3.88%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIKNX) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that LMVYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMVYXFIKNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

4.21%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

13.49%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

17.93%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

20.87%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.30%

24.49%

+0.81%

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKNX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMVYX vs. FIKNX - Dividend Comparison

LMVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than FIKNX's 8.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKNX
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Fund Class Z
8.15%10.24%4.82%5.32%5.92%8.07%0.58%3.65%8.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LMVYX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund
3.89%4.52%6.69%0.24%4.01%10.49%0.92%16.57%17.51%19.53%17.52%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, LMVYX and FIKNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIKNX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to LMVYX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMVYX dropped -59.70% vs FIKNX's -44.09%.

FIKNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMVYX and FIKNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer