PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMVYX vs. DHSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVYX achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than DHSCX's 27.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LMVYX has underperformed DHSCX with an annualized return of 8.94%, while DHSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.


LMVYX

1D
0.42%
1M
-1.11%
6M
8.95%
YTD
16.34%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
9.38%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
8.94%
ALL TIME*
11.80%

DHSCX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.26%
6M
19.95%
YTD
27.91%
1Y
42.53%
3Y*
19.29%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
10.63%
ALL TIME*
10.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMVYX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund
16.34%0.23%10.43%13.83%-15.05%27.60%8.57%20.63%-9.57%7.73%
DHSCX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
27.91%11.48%12.75%23.99%-15.11%32.30%-0.54%21.45%-15.23%10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVYX and DHSCX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2000

0.88

The correlation between LMVYX and DHSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMVYX vs. DHSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LMVYX
LMVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LMVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DHSCX
DHSCX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DHSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DHSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LMVYXDHSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.47

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.25

11.34

-6.09

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the DHSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVYX and DHSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVYX drawdown since its inception was -59.70%, which is greater than DHSCX's maximum drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVYX and DHSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMVYXDHSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.70%

-53.15%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-11.02%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.97%

-28.41%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.97%

-28.41%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.61%

-46.19%

-7.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.36%

-1.40%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-8.27%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.38%

+0.51%

Volatility

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund (LMVYX) is 3.88%, while Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that LMVYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMVYXDHSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.78%

-1.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.41%

14.11%

-1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

19.87%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

21.49%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.30%

22.24%

+3.06%

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVYX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than DHSCX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMVYX vs. DHSCX - Dividend Comparison

LMVYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than DHSCX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHSCX
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
4.54%5.80%16.10%30.73%18.17%17.43%0.32%6.94%10.29%6.68%2.50%1.63%
LMVYX
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value Fund
3.89%4.52%6.69%0.24%4.01%10.49%0.92%16.57%17.51%19.53%17.52%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMVYX and DHSCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHSCX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to LMVYX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LMVYX dropped -59.70% vs DHSCX's -53.15%.

DHSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMVYX and DHSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer