LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
LMVF.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - LMVF.DE tracks the MSCI EMU while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LMVF.DE returned 10.57%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LMVF.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LMVF.DE achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return.
LMVF.DE
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMVF.DE Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist | 8.83% | 24.80% | 9.34% | 18.84% | -11.91% | 22.15% | -0.72% | 27.42% | -13.08% | -1.52% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 14.34% | -18.69% | -3.73% | -9.07% | 3.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMVF.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between LMVF.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LMVF.DE
IBCJ.DE
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMVF.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.90 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 9.60 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMVF.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.65 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.15 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVF.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMVF.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.51% | -56.11% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -9.96% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.28% | -18.47% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -47.31% | +22.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.16% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.71% | -19.38% | +13.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 4.05% | -1.25% |
Volatility
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) is 4.52%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that LMVF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMVF.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 7.13% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 17.61% | -5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 23.48% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 26.72% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 25.15% | -7.51% |
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMVF.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
LMVF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while IBCJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMVF.DE Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist | 2.99% | 3.25% | 2.84% | 2.59% | 3.36% | 2.11% | 1.99% | 3.12% | 3.68% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMVF.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LMVF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LMVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
LMVF.DE tracks MSCI EMU, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LMVF.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for LMVF.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer