PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LMVF.DE achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly lower than DBXI.DE's 14.49% return.


LMVF.DE

1D
0.56%
1M
1.99%
YTD
8.83%
6M
10.68%
1Y
17.84%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

DBXI.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
2.55%
YTD
14.49%
6M
18.42%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
28.95%
5Y*
19.73%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist
8.83%24.80%9.34%18.84%-11.91%22.15%-0.72%27.42%-13.08%-1.52%
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF
14.49%37.50%18.27%33.40%-9.08%26.51%-4.28%33.02%-14.48%-3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LMVF.DE and DBXI.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2017

0.86

The correlation between LMVF.DE and DBXI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LMVF.DE
LMVF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMVF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DBXI.DE
DBXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LMVF.DEDBXI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.17

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.46

11.42

-4.96

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LMVF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LMVF.DE and DBXI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LMVF.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.94

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.09

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.19

+0.31

Drawdowns

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LMVF.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum DBXI.DE drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMVF.DE and DBXI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LMVF.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-69.49%

+30.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-9.62%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.28%

-17.56%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-25.10%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.77%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-29.56%

+23.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.67%

+0.13%

Volatility

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist (LMVF.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LMVF.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.63%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

12.34%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.60%

15.69%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

18.31%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

20.37%

-2.73%

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LMVF.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DBXI.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

LMVF.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Dividend Comparison

LMVF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than DBXI.DE's 3.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF
3.63%3.93%4.53%3.78%7.45%0.94%4.23%3.33%2.66%1.94%2.51%0.15%
LMVF.DE
Amundi MSCI EMU UCITS ETF Dist
2.99%3.25%2.84%2.59%3.36%2.11%1.99%3.12%3.68%0.35%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LMVF.DE and DBXI.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LMVF.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LMVF.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

LMVF.DE tracks MSCI EMU, while DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LMVF.DE and 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LMVF.DE and DBXI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer